Stella Hsieh, General Counsel at Comma3 Ventures, explores how stablecoins could redefine global payments provided governments step up with smart regulatory frameworks.
Stablecoins have rapidly emerged as a cornerstone of the Web3 ecosystem, driven by the necessity for reliable, stable-value payment instruments in blockchain transactions. Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, stablecoins offer stability by anchoring their value to fiat currencies or other stable assets. Their role is crucial within Web3 development, enabling seamless, low-cost, and instantaneous transactions. This stability not only facilitates cryptocurrency trading but also bridges traditional finance with blockchain technology, significantly enhancing the efficiency of global financial transactions.
The real-world benefits are becoming increasingly apparent. Payment giants such as Stripe have incorporated stablecoins like USDC into their systems, allowing transactions to be settled instantly on blockchain networks, significantly reducing transaction costs and broadening access to financial services, particularly for unbanked or underbanked populations.
However, the TerraUSD collapse in 2022 highlights the inherent risks of operating in a regulatory vacuum, underscoring the need for robust regulatory frameworks. Clear regulations ensure transparency, adequate reserves, and effective risk management, which in turn fosters greater consumer confidence and broader market adoption.
Admittedly, cryptocurrencies can be exploited for illicit purposes. Precisely for this reason, robust regulatory oversight is essential. Merely prohibiting cryptocurrency use outright risks stifling technological advancements and overlooking their significant potential benefits.
“The TerraUSD collapse in 2022 highlights the inherent risks of operating in a regulatory vacuum, underscoring the need for robust regulatory frameworks.”
Currently, stablecoins are predominantly anchored to the US dollar, mainly due to Web3’s borderless nature. Introducing a New Taiwan Dollar (NTD) stablecoin would directly compete with existing electronic payment mechanisms in Taiwan, which are already widespread. Therefore, demand for an NTD stablecoin may remain limited in the short term. However, given their convenience for cross-border transactions, demand for US dollar stablecoins is likely to continue rising.
Globally, regulatory approaches in the EU, Japan, and Singapore showcase effective models. Europe’s MiCA regulation, set to take effect in June 2024, emphasises liquidity, reserve adequacy, and market stability. Japan’s early adoption of stablecoin regulations in 2022 has successfully enhanced transparency and protected consumers, while Singapore’s recent framework similarly ensures asset backing and market integrity.
In Taiwan, regulatory development for stablecoins remains nascent. As of 2023, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) explicitly excluded stablecoins from its Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) guidelines, highlighting the urgent need for specific legislative action. The current uncertainty poses substantial challenges for market participants and consumers alike.
Taiwan, by adopting clear, comprehensive regulatory frameworks modelled after those of the EU, Japan, and Singapore, can significantly bolster consumer trust, minimise systemic risks, and stimulate blockchain innovation and financial technology development.
In conclusion, stablecoins represent a transformative innovation in digital finance, capable of profoundly reshaping both Web3 and real-world transactions. Robust, clear regulatory standards are essential to unlocking their full potential and integrating them seamlessly into the global economy.
Be part of a growing global community committed to advancing in-house legal leadership.
Markus Warmholz, Head of Corporate & International Legal Affairs and Legal Operations at Hartmann Group in Germany, outlines how corporate lawyers can align legal acumen...
Alexandre Verrien, former Legal Director France & Europe at Dell Technologies, examines why in-house legal teams often lose influence despite growing capability and argues that...
