Timo Spitzer, Advisory Board Member at GC Connected, examines how today’s General Counsel can move from volatility to coherence, outlining enduring principles that underpin sustainable leadership, sound judgment, and long-term institutional trust.
The role of the General Counsel is undergoing a profound transformation. Once perceived primarily as a technical expert or risk gatekeeper, today’s GC operates at the centre of enterprise decision-making, where legal judgment, strategic foresight, and institutional trust converge. In an environment defined by geopolitical instability, regulatory acceleration, technological disruption, and cultural fragmentation, legal excellence alone is no longer sufficient.
What increasingly distinguishes high-impact General Counsel is not access to better tools or larger teams, but adherence to a small number of enduring principles that guide decision-making under pressure. Over years of in-house leadership across complex and highly regulated environments, I have found five such principles to be consistently decisive: order, loyalty, intimacy, moderation, and enjoyment without excess. These are not abstract ideals. They are practical disciplines that enable sustainable leadership.
Order is often misunderstood as rigidity or bureaucracy. In reality, order is coherence. It is the invisible architecture that allows organisations to move quickly without losing control.
For the General Counsel, order begins with clarity: clear mandates for the legal function, transparent escalation mechanisms, disciplined prioritisation, and consistent standards of judgment. When legal advice is predictable in its rigour and reasoning, executives trust it – even when they do not like the answer.
In moments of crisis, order becomes a stabilising force. A GC who can structure ambiguity, frame issues calmly, and sequence decisions rationally provides value far beyond legal analysis. Order, in this sense, is not administrative; it is strategic.
Loyalty remains one of the most misunderstood concepts in corporate life. Properly understood, it is neither personal allegiance nor uncritical agreement. It is commitment to the long-term integrity of the institution.
The General Counsel’s primary loyalty is owed to the organisation as a legal and ethical entity. This requires independence of judgment and, at times, the willingness to deliver unwelcome advice. Paradoxically, this form of loyalty is what builds the deepest trust with boards and executive leadership over time.
Strong GC–CEO and GC–board relationships are characterised by candour, discretion, and mutual respect. They are not built on constant alignment, but on confidence that difficult issues will be addressed early, privately, and constructively.
“When legal advice is predictable in its rigour and reasoning, executives trust it – even when they do not like the answer.”
Effective General Counsel are close to the business – not as observers, but as partners. This proximity, or intimacy, is essential to relevance.
Understanding the commercial rationale, cultural context, and human dynamics behind decisions allows the GC to anticipate risks rather than merely react to them. It also enables legal advice that is pragmatic, proportionate, and aligned with strategic objectives.
At the same time, proximity must not erode independence. The GC must remain sufficiently detached to preserve objectivity and credibility. Maintaining this balance -being close enough to influence but distant enough to judge – is one of the defining challenges of senior legal leadership.
Legal training often emphasises binary thinking: lawful or unlawful, compliant or non-compliant. Leadership, however, requires calibration.
Moderation is the discipline of distinguishing between critical and manageable risk, between symbolic compliance and substantive integrity. In a polarised environment, where organisations are pressured to adopt absolute positions, the General Counsel must often provide nuance and perspective.
Moderation also applies internally. Sustainable leadership requires realistic expectations, effective delegation, and the ability to preserve focus over time. Excessive intensity may produce short-term results, but it undermines long-term judgment and resilience.
The demands placed on modern General Counsel are significant: constant availability, high stakes, and limited margin for error. In this context, enjoyment without excess is not indulgence; it is a professional necessity.
Enjoyment – whether derived from intellectual challenge, trusted relationships, or time away from immediate pressures – supports clarity of thought and emotional stability. Excess, by contrast, clouds judgment and accelerates burnout.
A balanced GC brings steadiness to the organisation. That steadiness is often underestimated, yet it is one of the most valuable qualities a legal leader can offer in times of uncertainty.
The global General Counsel community is redefining its role. As legal leaders become institutional stewards, the importance of underlying principles increases. Order, loyalty, intimacy, moderation, and enjoyment without excess are not trends. They are disciplines that endure because they enable trust, judgment, and sustainable performance.
In an era of volatility, coherence is a competitive advantage. For General Counsel, these principles provide a reliable compass – one that supports not only effective legal leadership, but resilient organisations.
Be part of a growing global community committed to advancing in-house legal leadership.
Alexander Shevchenko, Chief Legal Officer at WebPay, offers a practical framework for managing large legal teams, from structure and systems to culture, communication, and trust....
Alexandre Verrien, former Legal Director France & Europe at Dell Technologies, examines why in-house legal teams often lose influence despite growing capability and argues that...
Executive Director & Head of Legal - Germany, Austria, Switzerland & Nordic Countries
Banco Santander
Germany